A multi-institutional survey on perceptions about clinical application of Anatomy
2013
- 11Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage11
- Abstract Views11
Artifact Description
Background: The primary purpose of anatomy education is to improve students’ competence in their future clinical practice. In Pakistan there has been less emphasis in teaching anatomy in collaboration with clinicians, so there is a need to evaluate the students’ ability to apply the knowledge of anatomy to patient care. We aimed to evaluate and compare the perceptions of medical students and interns regarding their application of anatomical knowledge in clinical aspects.Methodology: This cross sectional survey included questionnaire on perceptions about clinical application of anatomy, using five point Likert scale. Sampling frame comprised of 205 final year students, 38 faculty members, supervising these students and 60 house officers from four medical colleges/teaching hospitals, with two colleges following integrated curriculum and two from traditional teaching. ANOVA and student t-test were used for statistical analysis.Results: The response rate was 87%. The students and interns from group of traditional curriculum perceived to be ill prepared in application of knowledge of anatomy in multiple clinical disciplines. Over all perceptions about clinical application of anatomy were significantly high in participants from medical colleges based on integrated teaching as compared to colleges with traditional curricula (p0.05)Conclusion: Anatomy curriculum should be modified in traditional medical schools in Pakistan, focusing on the role of anatomy in all clinical disciplines and the anatomy related to gynecology and obstetrics needs to be strengthened in both groups.Key words: undergraduate anatomy curriculum, clinical anatomy, application of anatomy, perceptions
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know