Covid-19 and dropout of vulnerable schoolgoing children
2022
- 5Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage5
- Abstract Views5
Thesis / Dissertation Description
COVID-19 pandemic affected the education sector negatively. It led to learning losses and higher inequalities. The current exploratory qualitative study aims to explore how the factors related to school, infrastructure, and household affect the vulnerable school-going children during COVID-19 and what strategies were employed to mitigate these factors using a critical theory lens. The data was collected through semi-structured interviews and focused group discussions from the stakeholders of two schools including six students, six parents, six teachers, and two school heads. The findings of the study revealed that school closures, gaps in delivering the home assignments, learning losses, assessment and completion of home assignments, policies affected teaching and learning after schools reopen, promotions to the next classes, connectivity issues, unavailability of electronic gadgets, untrained staff, large families, weak household economies, house chores, child labour, illiterate parents, household environment, unaffordability of home tuitions, household sickness, relocation and school expenses are the major factors affected children from vulnerable families. To reduce the effects stakeholders of the school community put their efforts together. The home-based assignments were delivered to children at their doorstep. The teachers made efforts to lessen the learning losses in regular classes by using traditional teaching methods such as drills and practice. Social systems were created to help low-income families economically through family help and the Ehsas program. To further eliminate dropout risk a five-step model and an early warning system is suggested. The study suggests developing coordination between stakeholders to restrict dropouts in vulnerable school-going children. Furthermore, professional development programs are recommended on an urgent basis for teachers to help overcome the learning losses of children during COVID.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know