Media coverage of the covid-19 pandemic: a case of new vision and daily monitor in Uganda.
2024
- 282Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage282
- Downloads242
- Abstract Views40
Thesis / Dissertation Description
The media performs a significant role in shaping and transforming public perceptions during pandemics. This study analysed the media coverage of COVID-19 in Uganda, focusing on its impact on public awareness, government response, and societal behaviour. The study applied a quantitative approach to content analysis of news articles and official government communication, with interviews of journalists at the helm of COVID-19 reporting. The analysis assessed the framing of COVID-19 news in print media platforms. It examined the dynamics between media, government, and public health officials, evaluating the effectiveness of information dissemination and management of misinformation. The initial focus of media coverage of COVID-19 in Uganda was often focused on the global impact and severity of the virus, often contributing to heightened anxiety. However, as the pandemic unfolded, media outlets redirected their focus to local responses, government directives, and community stories. This study was obligated to discover the role of media in the coverage of the COVID19 pandemic. The study identified challenges and opportunities in media coverage, such as more contextualized reporting and a stronger collaboration between media and health officials. The media influenced countering misinformation, creating community resilience and solidarity by spotlighting positive stories and successful strategies. The study aimed to contribute to the effectiveness of strategic and ethical journalism in shaping public response and promoting effective public health measures. The study recommends that media experts, health authorities, and policymakers improve effective communication strategies.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know