Inclusive Pedagogy in the Face of Implicit Bias: Critical Conversations on Educating the Whole Person in the STEM Disciplines
2020
- 101Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage101
- Abstract Views101
Artifact Description
Kennedy Union 311Percentages of women and underrepresented minorities within STEM faculty still lag behind the overall population percentages. This workshop will provide the opportunity to continue the conversations from last year’s LTC Forum, where we engaged in critical conversations related to patterns of implicit biases including: Prove-it-again, Tightrope, Maternal Wall, and Tug of War. After a brief overview of the implicit biases that impact diversity and inclusion, we will discuss challenges for STEM faculty and collectively develop strategies that can enhance inclusivity for Faculty in the STEM fields. These critical conversations will be held without repercussions and will help us to learn from each other with experiences facing similar barriers.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know