What's in YOUR Institutional Repository?
Digital Initiatives Symposium
2014
- 320Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage320
- Abstract Views194
- Downloads126
Lecture / Presentation Description
This session focuses on digital collections at the University of Dayton Libraries and how it has evolved from using a stand-alone digital asset management system (CONTENTdm) to a flexible, robust, open-access institutional repository solution hosted by Berkley Electronic Press (Bepress). We share our trials and errors from our first digitization initiatives that began in 2006, to the launch of our first digital collection using CONTENTdm in 2010, to the implementation of our IR, eCommons, in 2013. We demonstrate how we have transformed our IR into a digital platform that not only features faculty scholarship, but also highlights our special collections. Learn what led to our decision to migrate all of our collections out of CONTENTdm and host them within eCommons, making a concerted effort to prioritize the digitization of the collections that reflect and express our Catholic and Marianist charisms along the way. We currently have nine digital collections that speak to our Catholic traditions. Three of these collections are used to provide a comparison of the old platform (CONTENTdm) to the new IR (Digital Commons), showing the ability to create communities that include magazines, photographs, audio clips and videos. A few of the third party plugins used in conjunction with Digital Commons are also demonstrated, such as YouTube, SoundCloud, and ISSUU. Digitization workflows, procedures, collection proposal forms and checklists that have been developed to aid in the migration of these digital collections have be included for use at your institution.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know