Caffeine Rush! Examining the Effects of Caffeine on Spatial Working Memory
2018
- 873Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage873
- Downloads617
- Abstract Views256
Thesis / Dissertation Description
Past research concerning caffeine and its effects on memory have yielded varying results. One study found that a 3-mg/kg dose of caffeine decreased reaction time during a selective attention task. However, this improvement was only found during a low display load, with no effect on reaction time occurring within a high display load (Lorist, Snell, Kok, & Mulder,1996). As such, the effects of caffeine may be dependent on a variety of other factors, such as the difficulty of the task at hand (Nehlig, 2004). This present study aimed to explore further the potential memory-enhancing qualities of caffeine with respect to spatial working memory. In order to test for any possible effects, a matched-pairs design was conducted to compare the number of errors committed, amount of moves taken, and time till task completion between a placebo and experimental group as the participants completed a series of levels within a computerized version of the popular puzzle game, Rush Hour (Di Vece, 2001). Repeated-measures ANOVAs (N=20) showed no significant effects of condition for any of the variables of performance studied. However, a trend analysis to examine potential changes over time with respect to condition was not conducted. A separate measure to assess any stress incurred (Dundee Stress State Questionnaire) was also used in this study. Further analysis using the data collected from this questionnaire is set to be conducted at a later date.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know