Assessment of Orofacial Myofunctional Profiles of Undergraduate Students in the United States
2020
- 630Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage630
- Downloads510
- Abstract Views120
Thesis / Dissertation Description
Background: Previous research indicates a high prevalence of orofacial myofunctional disorders in the general population. It was further reported that orofacial dysfunction may have wide ramifications, such as teeth displacement, articulation errors, swallowing difficulties, middle ear infections, and frequent colds. The purpose of this study was to examine orofacial myofunctional profiles of undergraduate students in the United States.Method: The English version of the Nordic Orofacial Test-Screening (NOT-S) was used to assess 55 undergraduate university students (age range:18 to 23 years). In addition, each participant completed a standard hearing screening, as well as a hearing history questionnaire.Results: In our study sample, 31% of the undergraduate students who participated in the current research were ‘flagged’ to have an orofacial myofunctional disorder. There was no statistically significant correlation between middle ear infections and orofacial myofunctional disorders as assessed by the NOT-S.Conclusion: Although 31% of the study participants were ‘flagged’ for an orofacial myofunctional disorder, it appears that orofacial myofunctional disorders might be over-diagnosed depending on the assessment measures used. These findings may have direct implications for clinical practice with respect to assessment and intervention of patients with orofacial myofunctional disorders.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know