Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Treatments on Depression
Encompass Digital Archive: University Presentation Showcase: Graduate Poster Gallery
2016
- 1,603Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage1,603
- Downloads1,274
- 1,274
- Abstract Views329
Image Description
Depression is reported to affect 10% of US adults every year, and we spend $10 billion treating depression. Is there a difference in effectiveness between traditional talk therapy, medications, or the combination in treating depression? To answer this question, we meta-analyzed 10 studies (N = 2162) that compared these three types of interventions. Overall, the combination of treatments was more effective than either talk therapy or medication alone (d = 4.35 vs 1.93 and 2.53). These findings were moderated by how the depression symptoms were measured. Traditional measures of depression (BDI and Hamilton) showed much larger effect sizes than less commonly used measures (DAS, DEQ, SOS-10, and SPSI). In our society which focuses on quick fixes for complex problems, clinicians who prescribe antidepressant medications should take into consideration the added benefits of talk therapy in order to create the most beneficial treatment plan for their patients.
Bibliographic Details
Encompass Digital Archive, Eastern Kentucky University
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know