Analysis of American Think Tanks' Views on China-US Chip Competition and Its Enlightenment
Vol: 6, Issue: 3, Page: 98-110
2024
- 23Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage23
- Downloads15
- Abstract Views8
Artifact Description
[Purpose/significance]This paper focuses on the viewpoints of leading American think tanks on chip competition with China, aiming to unravel the logic behind the formulation of U.S. chip policies towards China. It also seeks to explore innovative pathways for the development of China's chip industry and provide strategic recommendations beneficial to Sino-American chip competition. [Method/process]The study selects 20 representative research reports from 9 prominent think tanks and employs a literature analysis approach to dissect the viewpoints, motives, and potential influences found in these reports. [Result/conclusion]The results reveal that most American think tanks adopt a firm stance, perceiving the rise of China's chip industry as a threat. Calls for sanctions against Chinese chips dominate the mainstream discourse. In response, China should strengthen its own innovation strategy and actively address the situation through avenues such as deepening Sino-American dialogues for understanding and seeking international multilateral cooperation.
Bibliographic Details
https://eng.kjqbyj.com/journal/vol6/iss3/8; https://eng.kjqbyj.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1155&context=journal; http://dx.doi.org/10.19809/j.cnki.kjqbyj.2024.03.008; https://dx.doi.org/10.19809/j.cnki.kjqbyj.2024.03.008; https://www.chndoi.org/Resolution/Handler?doi=10.19809/j.cnki.kjqbyj.2024.03.008
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know