Discreetly depicting "an outrage": Graphic illustration and "Daisy Miller"'s reputation
Henry James Review, ISSN: 1080-6555, Vol: 29, Issue: 1, Page: 65-79
2008
- 3Citations
- 614Usage
- 7Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- CrossRef3
- Usage614
- Downloads543
- Abstract Views71
- Captures7
- Readers7
Article Description
Rendering the first illustrated edition of "Daisy Miller" in 1892, Harry Whitney McVickar had to reconcile the novella's scandalous reputation with the polite medium of graphic illustration. McVickar highlights insignificant scenery, shows solitary figures instead of social interaction or playful flirtation, and nearly omits the heroine. His depictions and omissions contain the characters' indiscretions, and ensure that aspiring flirts and would-be Winterbournes who view his images do not "get the wrong idea." Cinematic adaptations amplify Daisy's public displays and encourage Winterbourne's voyeurism, but "Daisy Miller"'s first graphic illustrations strove instead to redeem the reputation of James's "outrage on American girlhood."
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=70449848692&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hjr.2008.0002; https://muse.jhu.edu/article/231819; https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/cleng_facpub/87; https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1087&context=cleng_facpub; https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hjr.2008.0002
Project MUSE
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know