Disturbance Rejection in Thermal Power Plants
Control Conference (CCC), 2011 30th Chinese, Yantai, Page: 6350-6355
2011
- 7Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage7
- Abstract Views7
Conference Paper Description
A typical thermal power plant is characterized by nonlinearity, changing parameters, unknown disturbances, large time-delays, large inertia and highly coupled dynamics among various control loops, making it one of the most challenging industrial control problems beyond scope of existing theories. Currently proportional–integral–derivative (PID) control, an eighty-year-old technology, is still the predominant tool of choice in power plant control. Given the potential economic payoff, better solutions to power plant control are highly desired. An alternative framework is proposed in this paper to study the control problem in thermal power plants in which disturbance rejection is the central theme. As a result, control problems are better understood as well as the means of solving them. This new formulation of existing problems is followed by a systematic review of disturbance rejection methods that ultimately leads us to the concept of Active Disturbance Rejection.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know