Effect of Laser Spot Size, Scanning Strategy, Scanning Speed, and Laser Power on Microstructure and Mechanical Behavior of 316L Stainless Steel Fabricated via Selective Laser Melting
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, ISSN: 1544-1024, Vol: 31, Issue: 3, Page: 2205-2224
2022
- 52Citations
- 10Usage
- 81Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations52
- Citation Indexes52
- 52
- CrossRef1
- Usage10
- Abstract Views10
- Captures81
- Readers81
- 81
Article Description
Selective laser melting (SLM) is a promising additive manufacturing process for fabricating complex geometries of metallic parts. The SLM processing parameters can have a major effect on microstructure and mechanical behavior of the fabricated metallic parts. In this work, the effect of laser spot size, hatch spacing, energy density, scan strategy, scanning speed and laser power on the microstructure and mechanical behavior of SLM-processed 316L stainless steel samples has been studied. These samples processed with different processing parameters were characterized by performing microhardness, tensile tests, x-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, Energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis. The samples fabricated with a larger laser spot size exhibited higher tensile strength as well as higher microhardness values. A similar trend was observed for samples processed with higher laser power and hatch spacing. For the same energy density, higher laser power and lower scanning speed significantly enhance the mechanical properties of SLM processed samples compared to those fabricated with lower laser power and higher scanning speed. Therefore, it can be concluded that laser power has a more dominant role in governing the mechanical properties of SLM processed parts than scanning speed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85118974710&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-06387-8; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11665-021-06387-8; https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/enme_facpub/391; https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1394&context=enme_facpub; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-06387-8; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11665-021-06387-8
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know