Control of walking in the stick insect: From behavior and physiology to modeling
Autonomous Robots, ISSN: 0929-5593, Vol: 7, Issue: 3, Page: 271-288
1999
- 35Citations
- 3Usage
- 33Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations35
- Citation Indexes35
- 35
- CrossRef25
- Usage3
- Abstract Views3
- Captures33
- Readers33
- 33
- Mentions2
- References2
- Wikipedia2
Article Description
Classical engineering approaches to controlling a hexapod walker typically involve a central control instance that implements an abstract optimal gait pattern and relies on additional optimization criteria to generate reference signals for servocontrollers at all the joints. In contrast, the gait of the slow-walking stick insect apparently emerges from an extremely decentralized architecture with separate step pattern generators for each leg, a strong dependence on sensory feedback, and multiple, in part redundant, primarily local interactions among the step pattern generators. Thus, stepping and step coordination do not reflect an explicit specification based on a global optimization using a representation of the system and its environment; instead they emerge from a distributed system and from the complex interaction with the environment. A similarly decentralized control at the level of single leg joints also may explain the control of leg dynamics. Simulations show that negative feedback for control of body height and walking direction combined with positive feedback for generation of propulsion produce a simple, extremely decentralized system that can handle a wide variety of changes in the walking system and its environment. Thus, there is no need for a central controller implementing global optimization. Furthermore, physiological results indicate that the nervous system uses approximate algorithms to achieve the desired behavioral output rather than an explicit, exact solution of the problem. Simulations and implementation of these design principles are being used to test their utility for controlling six-legged walking machines.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0033361312&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1008980606521; http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1008980606521; https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/scibges_facpub/137; https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1138&context=scibges_facpub; http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1008980606521; https://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1008980606521; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1008980606521
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know