Quantum arbitrary shaped beams revisited
Optics Communications, ISSN: 0030-4018, Vol: 273, Issue: 1, Page: 296-305
2007
- 14Citations
- 6Usage
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations14
- Citation Indexes14
- 14
- CrossRef8
- Usage6
- Abstract Views6
- Captures3
- Readers3
Article Description
In a current effort, we examine the analogies between electromagnetic scattering and quantum mechanical potential scattering of an incident arbitrary shaped beam. Quantum arbitrary shaped beams, introduced previously in a recent paper, have been found to be inadequate to provide a satisfactory analogy to the electromagnetic case. In this paper, we explain the origin of this inadequacy through the use of various examples, and introduce quantum Eigen-arbitrary shaped beams which exhibit a close analogy between electromagnetic scattering and quantum mechanical potential scattering of shaped beam.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030401806013526; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2006.12.024; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33947104695&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0030401806013526; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0030401806013526?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0030401806013526?httpAccept=text/plain; https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/sciphysics_facpub/153; https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1153&context=sciphysics_facpub; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2006.12.024
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know