An Improved Method of Arsenic (III) Removal By Reverse Osmosis Membrane
2017
- 3,221Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage3,221
- Downloads3,106
- 3,106
- Abstract Views115
Thesis / Dissertation Description
Arsenic is a Group 1 carcinogen as there is abundant research to support that ingestion of arsenic in drinking water and food can lead to liver, lung, kidney, or bladder cancer in humans. The recommend World Health Organization (WHO) arsenic standard in drinking water is 10 µg/L, while the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) of arsenic in drinking water is 10 µg/L. Globally, at least 40 million people face more than 10 µg/L arsenic contamination in their drinking water. As(III) (trivalent state, such as arsenite), and As(V) (pentavalent state, such as arsenates) are the dominant arsenic forms in water. Because the pKas of arsenite and arsenate are 9.2 and 2.2, respectively, the dominant form of arsenite in natural water is as a neutral molecule, while arsenate is present in ionic form. According to previous research, removal of As(III) by RO treatment is 50 to 80%, but more than 98% As(V) is removed as the dissociated arsenate ions are amenable to removal by RO. Therefore, oxidizing As(III) to As(V) can improve arsenic removal by RO membranes. In this study, electrolytic oxidation was used to oxidize arsenite in the feed water, and then arsenic removal using RO membrane was measured. The use of electrochemical pretreatment ahead of RO membranes has not been explored deeply, and no existing studies address the feasibility of electrolytic oxidation to improve arsenic removal by RO membranes. The results of this study showed that electrolytic oxidation using Ti/IrO2 electrodes under 30 mA DC current in 500 mg/L NaCl solution can completely oxidize 360 µg/L As(III) to As(V) in 10 seconds. The subsequent arsenic removal by RO membranes increased from 54.2% (without oxidation) to 98.2%. The main oxidant generated in the electrolytic oxidation process was free chlorine. Using combined electrolysis-RO, the arsenic removal significantly increased beyond RO alone, even in the presence of ferrous and alkalinity and natural organic matter. The presence of sulfide impacted the As(III) form in water, producing ionic species, which increased the As(III) removal to close 90% without electrolytic oxidation.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know