Recruiting: An Undervalued Asset?
2013
- 438Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage438
- Downloads354
- Abstract Views84
Project Description
NCAA Division I basketball has grown to be an enourmously lucrative business venture in recent years. However, in order to capitalize on the revenues that can be generated by NCAA Division I basketball schools need to be successful. Therefore, it is important to address what can lead to success. Previously, it was thought that coaching status and skill were the key factors leading to success. However, research has been done to discover the relationship between recruiting and success in Division I Football, but very little research has been done on Division I Basketball. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between recruiting classes and the success of Division I men’s basketball teams. For the purpose of my study I defined success as having a conference winning percentage above .500. In order to measure this relationship I collected data from the major six conferences (ACC, SEC, Big Ten, Big 12, Big East, and Pac-12) basketball teams along with conferences with teams who have experienced recent success (Mountain West, WCC, and C-USA). I will be using Pearson’s coefficient correlation in order to measure the relationship between recruiting and. I will be looking for at least a moderate to strong correlation (r=.5-.8) with a significance between .001 and .05.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know