Perception on the effects of peer influences on the academic performance of Bachelor of Science in nursing students of De La Salle Health Sciences Institute
2015
- 856Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage856
- Abstract Views856
Thesis / Dissertation Description
This study utilized a descriptive, non-experimental type of research to identify the demographic profile of the respondents in terms of age, gender, year level, family structure, residence, monthly family income and personality type, as well as the performance and whether there were any significant differences on the perception on the effects of peer influences on the academic performance by the respondents. Two hundred seventy-nine (279) students enrolled in Bachelor of Science in Nursing in De La Salle Health Sciences Institute were chosen using total population sampling. A self-made questionnaire was utilized as instrument and data was analysed using percentage, mean, standard deviation, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and t-test. The study concluded the following: (1) majority of the respondents were 18 to 21 years old, females most of them were from the first year level, belonging to a two-parent family, living in their own residences with their parents, aunties, grandparents or other relatives, had a monthly family income of Php100,000-249,999 and were ambiverts; (2) the respondents perceived to a great extent that peer influence has an effect on their academic performance. The respondents perceived to a great extent that they never focus more on bonding with their peers as this may prompt them to sneak out of class which results to missed quizzes and activities. They least perceived that they often were anxious about their poor performance in school whenever their peers performed well; (3) the perception on the effects of peer influences on the academic performance of the respondents were the same regardless of age, gender, year level, family structure, residence, monthly family income and personality type.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know