Factors contributing to the utilization of "hilot" as an alternative to modern medicine
2006
- 645Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage645
- Abstract Views645
Thesis / Dissertation Description
This study utilized a quantitative type of research. Snowball sampling technique was used to select 100 respondents from Indang, Cavite. A self-made questionnaire was used, composed of Part 1: Profile of the respondents and Part 2: Factors contributing to the utilization of “hilot” in Indang, Cavite. The statistical treatments used were frequency distribution, percentage, mean, f-test and t-test. The following conclusions were derived: 1) Majority of the respondents were young adult, female, Catholic and employed; 2) Availability and accessibility, information regarding, “hilot”, socio-economic, and tradition and culture were the factors considered as contributory to the utilization of “hilot” as an alternative modern medicine; 3) There were no significant differences in the factors contributing to the utilization of “hilot” as an alternative modern medicine when they were grouped according to age, gender, and religion. There was a significant difference among the factors when grouped according to employment status.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know