A study on the factors affecting clinical performance of B.S.N. Class '90 of De La Salle University - E.A.C.
1989
- 37Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage37
- Abstract Views37
Thesis / Dissertation Description
This study utilized the survey method. The subjects were the fourth year nursing students Class ’90 of DLSU-EAC. Twenty-five (25) students each from Section 1 and Section 2 were drawn using simple random sampling technique. There were 50 respondents out of the total population of 90 students. Data was obtained using the Information Sheet, general average of the clinical performance in nursing practice, and general average of the students in lectures in nursing in the previous years. Data was analyzed through percentage, mean and standard deviation. The study concludes that, 1) On clinical performance/practicum affecting intellectual and non-intellectual factors, clinical performance is affected by the intellectual factors. Majority are affected by the intellectual factors, where academic achievement had the strongest influence in the practicum. 2) On problems perceived by the students in clinical practicum as brought about by the factors, majority of the students perceived more problems in terms of intellectual factors than non-intellectual factors; 3) On the relationship between intellectual and non-intellectual factors and clinical practicum/performance, intellectual factors are significantly related to clinical practicum of the students while non-intellectual factors are not related to clinical performance of the students.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know