Assessment tasks as perceived by the freshmen radiologic technology students of De La Salle Medical and Health Sciences Institute
2022
- 100Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage100
- Abstract Views50
- Downloads50
Thesis / Dissertation Description
This study was conducted to determine the perceptions of 83 freshmen radiologic technology students at the De La Salle Medical and Health Sciences Institute regarding their assessment task in terms of difficulty and time spent. This study utilized a descriptive research design. Data were gathered using a self-made questionnaire and treated using frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, t-test for independent samples, and analysis of variance (ANOVA).The findings of the study show that the majority of the respondents are female, have taken STEM as their senior high school strand, and have a monthly family income ranging from PHP 19,041-38,080. In addition, the respondents perceived their assessment tasks as difficult, as most of them require students to focus on independent thorough studying of various lessons to pass examinations with complex questions and outputs that require their creativity. Furthermore, the respondents perceive that preparing for their assessment tasks takes up most of their study time, as most of these assessment tasks require brainstorming, planning, and studying multiple sets of lessons within a certain time frame. Moreover, there are no significant differences in the perceptions of freshmen radiologic technology students regarding the assessment task in terms of difficulty and time spent when they are grouped according to senior high school strands, sex, and monthly family income.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know