Levels of knowledge of residents of Dasmariñas, Cavite regarding the benefit packages and availment for in-patient management of confirmed coronavirus diseases (Covid-19)
2022
- 45Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage45
- Abstract Views40
- Downloads5
Project Description
The Benefit Packages for In-patient Management of Confirmed Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) were implemented in response to Presidential Proclamation No. 929 s.2020 declaring a State of Calamity in the Philippines. The goal of this study is to determine the respondents' level of knowledge regarding the PhilHealth response under the Universal Health Care Act (RA No. 11223). In addition, it aims to determine significant differences in their demographic characteristics, given that a previous study by Querri et al. (2018) did not cover the area of implications on situations like the pandemic. Thus, the result of their study gives limited knowledge on the accessibility of healthcare. The instrument utilized in this study is the Likert Scale to measure how much the respondents agree or disagree in terms of the Benefit Packages and Availment. The results of the study indicate that the overall knowledge of the respondents was deemed sufficient, but not fully proficient. However, the results also showed that the 16-20 years old age group have a significantly different level of knowledge than respondents in the >50 age group, revealing that they are the target population for information dissemination for the Availment of the Benefit Packages. The findings of this study do not merely identify how much do the public know about PhilHealth policies and how to utilize them in their cases, but also provide feedback to the government, specifically the improvements needed for the Philippine Health Insurance information system
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know