Reducing Readmissions: Findings from an Urban Academic Medical Center
2017
- 100Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage100
- Abstract Views100
Poster Description
Background: Hospital readmission rates are increasingly being utilized as a measure of quality and to modify hospital reimbursement. Many have argued that a significant proportion of readmissions can be prevented if modifiable factors had been intervened upon, but recent studies suggest that the majority of readmissions are most likely not preventable. In order to reduce overall hospital readmissions, clinicians and administrators should target factors which specifically address these preventablereadmissions.Objectives: This study seeks to identify trends in readmissions at the George Washington University Hospital and to identify factors which are associated with preventable readmissions. Results of this study will be compared with previously published national data. Results suggesting any unique characteristics of this institution's systemic, clinician, or patient-based factors contributing to early hospital readmissions can then be used to identify and prioritize targets for future improvement projects with the aim of reducing hospital readmissions.Design: A cross sectional survey was used to determine the proportion of readmissions which are preventable and identify associated risk factors. The survey used was modified from previously validated tools.Methods: All attendings in the division of hospital medicine attended a brief orientation session. Patients presenting as 30-day readmissions were identified using weekly readmissions reports. For each of those patients, the most recent attending physician was asked to indicate whether the readmission was more likely than not a preventable readmission. If yes, they were asked to select from several possible factors which may have contributed to that readmission.Results: To date, the survey response rate is 98%. Of the 163 responses available in the preliminary analysis of this ongoing study, 57% of readmissions were thought to be potentially preventable. Of those preventable readmissions, the most frequently identified associated factors were patient or caregiver's inability to adequately manage condition (49%), patients' non-medical social issues (29%), patients' failure to keep follow up appointments (13%), patients' uncertainty of whom to contact for outpatient care or when to return to ED (11%).Conclusions: Initial analysis indicates that GWUH may have higher levels of preventable readmissions when compared to other similarly conducted studies, in which rates of preventable readmissions ranged from 26.9% to 38%. Potential reasons for this finding range from the subjective nature of defining preventability to institutional or patient-population specific causes. The factors driving readmissions at GWUH are largely patient-related rather than hospital process-related, adding to the growing debate over whether readmissions are a reliable measure of hospital quality.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know