Disparities in Cardiac Rehabilitation Referral for Patients with Myocardial Infarction in the United States
2017
- 277Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage277
- Abstract Views277
Poster Description
Background: Each year an estimated 635,000 Americans experience a myocardial infarction (MI) and a treatment that has been shown to decrease mortality is cardiac rehabilitation. Proposed federal legislation, S.488, supports nurse practitioners and clinical nurse specialists to meet "direct supervision" requirements for cardiac rehabilitation programs. If passed, nurse leaders will need to work closely with hospitals to ensure all eligible MI patients are referred.Objective: To identify demographic and clinical characteristics of MI patients associated with lower cardiac rehabilitation referral rates in a national U.S. cohort.Methods: This was a retrospective cohort analysis using 2011-2015 data from the American College of Cardiology’s ACTION Registry-GWTGs. The cohort included 507,793 MI patients from 851 U.S. hospitals. Patients were stratified by referral versus non-referral and patient demographics and clinical characteristics were compared using χ2 tests (p<.05).Results: A total of 78% (n=395,948) of patients were referral for cardiac rehabilitation. Patients aged ≥80 years (70.9%, n=44,918, p≤.001) had the lowest rate of age groups. Women (75.2%, n= 123,191) had significantly lower referral rates compared to men (79.3%, n= 272,757) (χ2 = 1110.168, p ≤ .001). Hispanic patients (65.5%, n=19,149) had the lowest referral rate of all race/ethnicity groups. Referral rates were significantly lower for patients without PCI (64.4%, n=99,364) or CABG (76.7%, n=354,945) during admission compared to those with PCI and CABG (83.9%, n=296,584, p ≤ .001 and 76.7%, n=354,945, p≤001 respectively).Conclusions: Patients who were aged ≥80 years, Hispanic, or did not receive a PCI or CABG had lower referral rates. These results support a gap in referral for cardiac rehabilitation remains and there’s a need for quality improvement.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know