Detecting Depression and Anxiety Among Adolescents in South Africa: Validity of the isiXhosa Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7
Journal of Adolescent Health, ISSN: 1054-139X, Vol: 72, Issue: 1, Page: S52-S60
2023
- 28Citations
- 9Usage
- 135Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations28
- Citation Indexes27
- 27
- CrossRef2
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Usage9
- Abstract Views9
- Captures135
- Readers135
- 135
Article Description
Screening tools such as the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) could potentially be used in resource-limited settings to identify adolescents who need mental health support. We examined the criterion validity of the isiXhosa versions of the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 in detecting depression and anxiety among adolescents (10–19 years) in South Africa. Adolescents were recruited from the general population and from nongovernmental organizations working with adolescents in need of mental health support. The PHQ-9 and GAD-7 were culturally adapted and translated into isiXhosa and administered to 302 adolescents (56.9% female). The Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia was administered by trained clinicians as the gold standard diagnostic measure for depression and anxiety. For the PHQ-9, the area under the curve was 0.88 for the full sample of adolescents (10–19 years old). A score of ≥10 had 91% sensitivity and 76% specificity for detecting adolescents with depression. For the GAD-7, the area under the curve was 0.78, and cutoff scores with an optimal sensitivity-specificity balance were low (≥6). A score of ≥6 had 67% sensitivity and 75% specificity for detecting adolescents with anxiety. The culturally adapted isiXhosa version of the PHQ-9 can be used as a valid measure for depression in adolescents. Further research on the GAD-7 for use with adolescents is recommended.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054139X22006504; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.09.013; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85140777477&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36274021; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1054139X22006504; https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/gwhpubs/1754; https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2753&context=gwhpubs; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.09.013
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know