Reorganization of corticotectal connections
Trends in Neurosciences, ISSN: 0166-2236, Vol: 2, Issue: C, Page: 201-204
1979
- 3Citations
- 5Usage
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- CrossRef3
- Usage5
- Abstract Views5
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
Brain damage in the developing organism often results in less severe long-term dysfunction than ostensibly similar damage suffered in adulthood. The explanation for this observation is as yet unclear. One potentially fruitful approach for studying this phenomenon is to employ so-called ‘model systems’ in which the anatomical and functional consequences of early brain lesions can be documented. In this article Leo Chalupa and Robert Rhoades describe the effects of lesions of part of the visual cortex on subsequent reorganization of the synaptic connections with the midbrain. They find that the introduction of anatomical compensation does not necessarily lead to functional compensation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0166223679900808; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0166-2236(79)90080-8; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0018590786&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0166223679900808; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:0166223679900808?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:0166223679900808?httpAccept=text/plain; https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/smhs_pharm_facpubs/1051; https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2056&context=smhs_pharm_facpubs; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0166-2236%2879%2990080-8; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0166-2236%2879%2990080-8
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know