Caring for Rohingya Refugees With Diphtheria and Measles: On the Ethics of Humanity
Annals of Family Medicine, ISSN: 1544-1709, Vol: 18, Issue: 2, Page: 176-178
2020
- 14Usage
- 37Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage14
- Abstract Views14
- Captures37
- Readers37
- 37
Article Description
Hundreds of thousands of Rohingya refugees arrived in Bangladesh within weeks in fall 2017, quickly forming large settlements without any basic support. Humanitarian first responders provided basic necessities including food, shelter, water, sanitation, and health care. However, the challenge before them—a vast camp ravaged by diphtheria and measles superimposed on a myriad of common pathologies—was disproportionate to the resources. The needs were endless, resources finite, inadequacies abundant, and premature death inevitable. While such confines force unimaginable choices in resource allocation, they do not define the humanitarian purpose—to alleviate suffering and not allow such moral violations to become devoid of their horrifying meaning. As humanitarian workers, we maintain humanity when we care, commit, and respond to moral injustices. This refusal to abandon others in desperate situations is an attempt to rectify injustices through witnessing and solidarity. When people are left behind, we must not leave them alone.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544170920300767; http://dx.doi.org/10.1370/afm.2521; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85081235261&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32152024; http://www.annfammed.org/lookup/doi/10.1370/afm.2521; https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/sphhs_global_facpubs/501; https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1500&context=sphhs_global_facpubs; http://hdl.handle.net/10144/619644; https://dx.doi.org/10.1370/afm.2521; https://www.annfammed.org/content/18/2/176
Annals of Family Medicine
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know