Alternative payment models lead to strategic care coordination workforce investments
Nursing Outlook, ISSN: 0029-6554, Vol: 65, Issue: 6, Page: 737-745
2017
- 15Citations
- 25Usage
- 74Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations15
- Citation Indexes12
- 12
- CrossRef6
- Policy Citations3
- Policy Citation3
- Usage25
- Abstract Views25
- Captures74
- Readers74
- 74
Article Description
Care coordination is generally viewed as a key to success for health systems seeking to adapt to a range of new value-based payment policies. This study explores care coordination staffing in four health systems participating in new payment models, including Medicaid payment reform and Accountable Care Organizations. Comparative case study design is used to describe models of care coordination. Analysis of 43 semi-structured interviews with leadership, clinicians, and care coordination staff at four health systems engaged in value-based contracts. Each of the sites engaged in significant task shifting of low-complexity care coordination activities to licensed practical nurses, medical assistants, and other unlicensed personnel freeing up registered nurses and social workers for more complex patients. Few have care coordination experience, requiring a significant investment in on-the-job training. Payment reform is leading to a greater investment in the care coordination workforce. However, demonstrating the return on investment remains a challenge.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029655417300635; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2017.04.001; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85019756927&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28576295; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0029655417300635; https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/sphhs_policy_facpubs/851; https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1851&context=sphhs_policy_facpubs; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2017.04.001
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know