Interim succession: Temporary leadership in the midst of the perfect storm
Business Horizons, ISSN: 0007-6813, Vol: 56, Issue: 5, Page: 621-633
2013
- 20Citations
- 112Usage
- 84Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations20
- Citation Indexes20
- 20
- CrossRef8
- Usage112
- Downloads108
- Abstract Views4
- Captures84
- Readers84
- 84
Article Description
The corporate governance environment has changed. The rate of CEO successions is naturally trending up, succession planning is in dire need of repair, and boards are under increasing pressure to focus on oversight. This confluence of events creates a ‘perfect storm.’ Within this new environment, interim successions are on the rise. But is it all bad news? This article explores the decision of corporate directors to use temporary chief executive officers (CEOs) and the roles served by these interim leaders. We include a typology of interim CEOs and prescribe the contexts in which organizations can strategically pursue this type of succession. We conclude with a list of recommendations for how boards can most effectively manage interim leadership in the new corporate governance environment.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681313000736; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2013.05.005; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84882574984&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0007681313000736; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0007681313000736?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0007681313000736?httpAccept=text/plain; https://huskiecommons.lib.niu.edu/allfaculty-peerpub/928; https://huskiecommons.lib.niu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1927&context=allfaculty-peerpub; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2013.05.005
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know