Emotion regulation as a potential moderator for the association between peer victimization and student engagement
2016
- 92Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage92
- Downloads91
- Abstract Views1
Thesis / Dissertation Description
The peer victimization literature is vast and identifies numerous potential risk factors for and outcomes of victimization. One important and previously examined risk factor is emotion regulation ability. A significant outcome of victimization previously discussed in the literature is student disengagement at school. One growing focus of peer victimization research is to examine possible protective factors and areas for intervention. Because it is a trainable skill set, emotion regulation is a ripe area for investigation as both a protective factor and an area for intervention. The negative association between peer victimization and student engagement may result, in part, from poor emotion regulation skills. Inability to regulate one's emotions adaptively is associated with worsened outcomes following instances of victimization. Ruminating on the negative emotions associated with victimization may detract attention and resources away from student engagement. Strong emotion regulation ability, however, would allow students to redirect or reappraise following instances of peer victimization and remain engaged in school. The current study aimed to examine the associations among difficulty in six different components of emotion regulation and the frequency of relational and physical victimization. Furthermore, the current study explored emotion regulation as a potential moderator of the association between peer victimization and three types of student engagement. Finally, the emotion regulation profiles of victims of physical and relational aggression were compared and distinct patterns of difficulty were analyzed.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know