A Monte Carlo comparison of two-square least squares and ridge estimators in a simultaneous equation model
1988
- 5Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage5
- Abstract Views5
Thesis / Dissertation Description
Consider a model of the form shown below: Y = X*B + e where Y is a vector of dependent variables, X a matrix containing exogenous variables and e is a vector of independently and identically distributed (iid) white noise random variables. To estimate the parameters in B, the commonly used method is ordinary least squares (OLS). The OLS estimator is the best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE) of B. If, however, the vectors which make up the X matrix are collinear, then the OLS estimator while still unbiased may not be optimal under a mean square error (MSE) criterion. One potentially better estimator reviewed extensively in the literature are ridge estimators. But most of the literature deals with single equation models and very few papers have been written on the use of ridge regression in the context of a simultaneous equation model (SEM). Now one of the most popular techniques for estimating SEM is two-stage least squares (2SLS). But 2SLS is just OLS applied twice. Therefore, since ridge estimators have proved themselves to be superior to OLS in certain circumstances, we would expect that 2SLS estimators might be improved by applying ridge estimation techniques to it. We studied finite sample properties of 2SLS estimators obtained using ridge techniques. Our results indicated that unaltered 2SLS estimators were superior to the ridge alternatives.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know