The practice of reporting the photometric performance of the ellipsoidal-reflector spotlight
1980
- 3Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage3
- Abstract Views3
Thesis / Dissertation Description
In 1957, a joint committee of the Illuminating Engineering Society and the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers published the "Recommended Practice for Reporting Photometric Performance of Incandescent Filament Lighting Units Used in Theatre and Television Production." The objective of this publication was to standardize the manner in which photometric information was to be reported on lighting manufacturers' instrument data sheets. In 1958, this "Recommended Practice" was adopted as an industry standard by the United States Institute for Theatre Technology and the American Educational Theatre Association. The "Recommended Practice" establishes a guideline to be followed in the testing of lighting units, and it presents a very definite example of how the photometric performance specifications derived from this testing are to be presented on manufacturers' data sheets. If each lighting manufacturer followed this practice, a customer might easily compare the data sheets compiled by one manufacturer to those compiled by another manufacturer and therefore determine which lighting unit would best suit his needs. This is not the case, however. In the twenty years since the "Recommended Practice" was published, lighting manufacturers have developed their own testing procedures, and each has produced its own version of photometric data sheets. The direct comparison of lighting unit specifications from one manufacturer to those from another manufacturer is made very difficult if not impossible. From the companies in the United States which produce lighting equipment, three were selected for the purpose of having their data sheets examined. Those companies were the Altman Stage Lighting Company, the Kliegl Brothers Universal Electrical Stage Lighting Company, and Berkey Colortran. Each of these companies has designed its own version of the ellipsoidal-reflector spotlight and manufactures the units it sells. Each company has tested or has had tested its line of instruments and has made the results of these tests available to customers on their respective photometric data sheets. It was the purpose of this study to present and define the reporting standards as established by the IES/SMPTE "Recommended Practice" and then compare these standards to the current data reporting practices demonstrated by Altman, Kliegl, and Berkey Colortran. The testing and reporting procedures examined have been limited to those which pertain to the ellipsoidal-reflector spotlight. A detailed examination has been made of those sections in the "Recommended Practice" which relate to the ellipsoidal-reflector spotlight, and each of the selected companies' methods of ascertaining and reporting photometric data on those lighting units has been analyzed.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know