Enhanced Maximum Likelihood Models for Underreported Variables: Extending to Multiple Claims Dimension
2023
- 31Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage31
- Downloads28
- Abstract Views3
Thesis / Dissertation Description
This thesis builds upon the foundations laid out in Xia et al. [2023], which explored the utilizationof Maximum Likelihood approach to model misrepresentation data in Generalized Linear Models (GLM) ratemaking models. We introduce the concept of “underreported variables”, a form of insurance misrepresentation where insured individuals provide inaccurate information about risk factors that influence insurance eligibility, premiums, and insured amounts. Unlike fraudulent misrepresentation, underreported variables arise from a lack of awareness regarding the insured’s mental and physical health conditions, rather than fraudulent intent. The study rigorously tests the proposed model using health insurance data and extends its applicability to other insurance domains such as auto and home insurance. This research enhances claim prediction models by incorporating the probability of underreported variables, improving the accuracy of predictions. The work builds on earlier research by employing the Maximum Likelihood method for modeling and estimation, specifically in scenarios where each policy may have multiple claims. It derives partial and complete log likelihood functions for ratemaking models and uses the Expectation Maximization (EM) algorithm for parameter estimation. Notably, this research aligns with broader efforts in the insurance industry to detect fraudulent claims. It also contributes to the understanding of underreported variables in insurance ratemaking models, offering insights into improving predictive models for insurance claims across various domains.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know