Aircraft design
2008
- 65Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage65
- Downloads47
- Abstract Views18
Thesis / Dissertation Description
This project was conducted with the sole intention of creating an aircraft to compete in the Society of Automotive and Aerospace Engineers (SAE) Aero Design Series open class competition in Marietta, Georgia. Beginning in the fall semester, as an independent study in aerodynamics, this culminated in a wing design at the end of the semester. After wing design, the rest of the aircraft, including the fuselage, landing gear, tail, and controls were designed to exceed the performance parameters of the competition. With an aircraft design settled on, the Aero Design Team was started on campus to help in the testing and construction ofthe aircraft. Due to time constraints, a prototype aircraft was not constructed. Instead, components of the aircraft were tested individually including a wing, landing gear, fuselage and test airfoils. After testing, the arduous task of constructing the aircraft was accomplished with the help of the Aero Design Team. The aircraft placed 5th of 6 teams, which is extraordinary in light of no experience and no aerospace engineering program.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know