The Spider: Anaylsis of an Automaton
Proceedings from the Document Academy, Vol: 4, Issue: 2
2017
- 888Usage
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage888
- Downloads636
- Abstract Views252
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
[Editors' note: This paper is the 2017 winner of the Student Paper Award in Document(ation) Studies, http://documentacademy.org/award. Susannah Munson wrote the paper as a Kent State University, School of Information, Museum Studies student.]The physical objects that surround us document vast amounts of information about themselves, their histories, and their roles in broader social and cultural contexts. To reveal this sometimes hidden information, we examine these objects through analytical frameworks that go beyond descriptive accounts to explore how an object existed and was culturally understood throughout its history. Document phenomenology (Gorichanaz and Latham, 2016), conceived in two Acts, provides such an analytical framework in which we can examine the Spider as a document with physical and contextual information given meaning by a human actor [Act One] as well as explore its component parts and the overlapping and co-occurring sociocultural systems in which it has historically been situated [Act Two]. This paper uses the framework of document phenomenology to investigate a single object, a clockwork spider, as not only an object with physical properties and a life history, but also as an object temporally and spatially situated within the changing social and cultural contexts of its more than 400 years of existence. From wondrous curiosity to precursor of artificial intelligence, the Spider is much more than it first appears.
Bibliographic Details
Document Academy
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know