Hedge funds, managerial skill, and macroeconomic variables
Journal of Financial Economics, ISSN: 0304-405X, Vol: 99, Issue: 3, Page: 672-692
2011
- 69Citations
- 2,677Usage
- 205Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations69
- Citation Indexes66
- 66
- CrossRef38
- Policy Citations3
- Policy Citation3
- Usage2,677
- Downloads2,340
- 1,480
- Abstract Views337
- Captures205
- Readers205
- 205
Article Description
This paper evaluates hedge fund performance through portfolio strategies that incorporate predictability based on macroeconomic variables. Incorporating predictability substantially improves out-of-sample performance for the entire universe of hedge funds as well as for various investment styles. While we also allow for predictability in fund risk loadings and benchmark returns, the major source of investment profitability is predictability in managerial skills. In particular, long-only strategies that incorporate predictability in managerial skills outperform their Fung and Hsieh (2004) benchmarks by over 17% per year. The economic value of predictability obtains for different rebalancing horizons and alternative benchmark models. It is also robust to adjustments for backfill bias, incubation bias, illiquidity, fund termination, and style composition.
Bibliographic Details
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/bnp_research/13; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3079; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/1867
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304405X10002394; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.10.003; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=78951469674&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0304405X10002394; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0304405X10002394?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0304405X10002394?httpAccept=text/plain; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/bnp_research/13; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1008&context=bnp_research; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3079; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4078&context=lkcsb_research; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/1867; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2866&context=lkcsb_research; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.10.003
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know