Receptivity to assessment-based feedback for management development
Journal of Management Development, ISSN: 0262-1711, Vol: 19, Issue: 4, Page: 252-276
2000
- 46Citations
- 57Usage
- 63Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations46
- Citation Indexes46
- 46
- CrossRef39
- Academic Citation Index (ACI) - airiti1
- Usage57
- Abstract Views57
- Captures63
- Readers63
- 63
Article Description
Research on feedback acceptance typically has not focused on feedback given in developmental contexts nor has this research used sources other than self-reports to measure feedback acceptance. This study examined recipient characteristics as influences on receptivity to management development feedback. Racial similarity of the feedback recipient and giver was the most consistent predictor of receptivity. Self-report, feedback giver, and outsider ratings of receptivity evidenced little congruence. Implications for understanding receptivity in developmental contexts are discussed. © 2000, MCB UP Limited
Bibliographic Details
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/1965; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/2286
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84986021495&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02621710010322580; https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02621710010322580/full/html; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/1965; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2964&context=lkcsb_research; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/2286; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3285&context=lkcsb_research
Emerald
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know