Regret in cancer-related decisions
Health Psychology, ISSN: 0278-6133, Vol: 24, Issue: 4 SUPPL., Page: S29-34
2005
- 160Citations
- 1,588Usage
- 110Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations160
- Citation Indexes160
- 160
- CrossRef129
- Academic Citation Index (ACI) - airiti1
- Usage1,588
- Downloads1,496
- 1,496
- Abstract Views92
- Captures110
- Readers110
- 110
Review Description
Decision-related regret is a negative emotion associated with thinking about a past or future choice. The thinking component generally takes the form of a wish that things were otherwise and involves a comparison of what actually did or will take place with some better alternative-a "counterfactual thought." For predecisional (anticipated) regret, the thinking involves a mental simulation of the outcomes that might result from different choice options. Prior research has focused on regret associated with decision outcomes, addressing especially (a) the comparison outcome selected and (b) whether the outcome resulted from action or inaction. More recent research examines regret associated with the choice itself and with the preceding decision process. Interest here has focused on the justifiability of the choice made or the process used. In this article, the authors review current regret research and propose directions for extending it to cancer-related decisions. Copyright 2005 by the American Psychological Association.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=23244435888&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.s29; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16045415; https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S29; http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S29; http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/hea/24/4S/S29.pdf; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/2495; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3494&context=lkcsb_research; https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.s29; https://doi.apa.org:443/doiLanding?doi=10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S29; http://doi.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S29
American Psychological Association (APA)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know