Technological expectation and consumer preferences for product form
Journal of Business Research, ISSN: 0148-2963, Vol: 65, Issue: 9, Page: 1290-1294
2012
- 9Citations
- 112Usage
- 41Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- CrossRef2
- Usage112
- Abstract Views112
- Captures41
- Readers41
- 41
Article Description
Increasingly, manufacturers address consumers' fear of product obsolescence by offering products in a modular form, hence allowing the consumer to replace or upgrade components as needed. The extant literature, however, has not studied consumers' responses to product modularity. This study explores how consumers weigh potential benefits (e.g., alleviate obsolescence concerns) vis-a- v is downsides (e.g., magnify complexity perceptions) to arrive at product-form preferences. The study further extends the literature by showing product lifecycle stages and order-of-entry to moderate the impact of product modularity on consumer preferences.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296311003766; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.032; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84861724609&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0148296311003766; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0148296311003766?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0148296311003766?httpAccept=text/plain; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3154; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4153&context=lkcsb_research; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.032
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know