The Impact of Transnational Intellectual Property Rights on Firms’ Knowledge Formation: Evidence from China-US Patent Dyads
Academy of International Business Annual Meeting, 24-28 June 2011, Nagoya
2011
- 1,679Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage1,679
- Downloads1,599
- 1,599
- Abstract Views80
Conference Paper Description
As firms and organizations increasingly operate and conduct R&D in emerging economies, “transnational patenting” – patenting of the same invention across more than one country – is becoming the cornerstone of their intellectual property strategy. Drawing on works from signaling theory and intellectual property strategy, I examine the dynamics and impact of transnational patenting on technological knowledge formation across distinct intellectual property right (IPR) institutions. Using a novel dataset of 4226 China-US patent dyads covering 1104 firms and organizations, I find patent grant to technological invention under a weak IPR institution such as China significantly increases (by up to 108%) follow-on knowledge formation and adoption under a strong IPR institution such as U.S. The increase is most salient for inventions covered by broader patents, for patents awarded in the life sciences and to firms located in clusters with higher de facto institutional quality such as the Chinese municipalities of Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin or Chongqing. These findings highlight how policy aiming to improve IPR institutional qualities in an emerging economy can have an influential effect on a developed economy. This study also sheds light on how transnational patenting strategy employed by innovating firms in one market can shape knowledge formation in another.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know