A cautionary note on the effects of range restriction on predictor intercorrelations
Journal of Applied Psychology, ISSN: 0021-9010, Vol: 92, Issue: 2, Page: 538-544
2007
- 81Citations
- 895Usage
- 118Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations81
- Citation Indexes81
- 81
- CrossRef55
- Academic Citation Index (ACI) - airiti1
- Usage895
- Downloads869
- Abstract Views26
- Captures118
- Readers118
- 118
- Mentions2
- References2
- Wikipedia2
Article Description
The purpose of this research report is to highlight a unique set of issues that arise when considering the effects of range restriction in the context of estimating predictor intercorrelations. Three approaches are used to illustrate the issue: simulation, a concrete applied example, and a reanalysis of a meta-analysis of ability-interview correlations. The general conclusion is that a predictor intercorrelation can differ dramatically from the population value when both predictors are used in a composite that is used operationally for selection. The compensatory nature of a composite means that low scorers on one predictor can only obtain high scores on the composite if they obtain very high scores on the other predictor; this phenomenon distorts the correlation between the predictors. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33947362983&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.538; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17371098; https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.538; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5694; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6693&context=lkcsb_research; https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.538; https://doi.apa.org:443/doiLanding?doi=10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.538
American Psychological Association (APA)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know