Incremental Validity of Leaderless Group Discussion Ratings Over and Above General Mental Ability and Personality in Predicting Promotion
International Journal of Selection and Assessment, ISSN: 1468-2389, Vol: 23, Issue: 4, Page: 373-381
2015
- 9Citations
- 724Usage
- 64Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- CrossRef3
- Usage724
- Abstract Views464
- 433
- Downloads260
- 2
- Captures64
- Readers64
- 64
Article Description
Leaderless group discussions (LGDs) constitute one of the oldest assessment center exercises. In recent times, their added value has sometimes been questioned in light of trends to streamline assessment centers. The purpose of the present study is to examine the incremental validity of LGD ratings over cognitive ability scores and personality ratings for the prediction of extrinsic career success (i.e., promotion speed and number of promotions). We investigated this issue in the context of the promotion of French naval officers (N=93) in an academy for high-level executive positions over a 10-year period. Results indicated that LGD ratings accounted for incremental variance in the prediction of promotion criterion measures, beyond cognitive ability and personality test scores. These results confirm that LGD ratings provide a unique contribution to the prediction of extrinsic career success in high-level executive positions. © 2015 John Wiley
Bibliographic Details
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5710; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5686
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84945302257&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12121; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijsa.12121; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5710; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6709&context=lkcsb_research; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5686; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6685&context=lkcsb_research; https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12121; https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2682798; https://ssrn.com/abstract=2682798; http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/ijsa.12121; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ijsa.12121; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ijsa.12121; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ijsa.12121
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know