The measurement of corporate portfolio strategy: Analysis of the content validity of related diversification indexes
Strategic Management Journal, ISSN: 0143-2095, Vol: 24, Issue: 1, Page: 39-59
2003
- 137Citations
- 90Usage
- 242Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations137
- Citation Indexes135
- 135
- CrossRef117
- Academic Citation Index (ACI) - airiti2
- Policy Citations2
- 2
- Usage90
- Abstract Views90
- Captures242
- Readers242
- 242
Article Description
Measures developed for the analysis of corporate diversification have become fundamental to a broad range of strategy research. This paper examines the content validity of the two most widely used continuous measures of related diversification-the related component of the entropy index and the concentric index-and raises fundamental questions about their validity as indicators of portfolio relatedness. These questions are not driven by the use of SIC data for estimation of the indexes; they involve validity problems intrinsic to the construction of the measures. The related component of entropy and the concentric index are sensitive to features of corporate portfolio composition that may not be directly linked to portfolio relatedness. These sensitivities can create important ambiguities in strategy research.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0037227262&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.282; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smj.282; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/63; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1062&context=lkcsb_research; https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.282
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know