Bayesian Optimization with Switching Cost: Regret Analysis and Lookahead Variants
IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, ISSN: 1045-0823, Vol: 2023-August, Page: 4011-4018
2023
- 2Citations
- 184Usage
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
- Usage184
- Downloads159
- Abstract Views25
- Captures1
- Readers1
Conference Paper Description
Bayesian Optimization (BO) has recently received increasing attention due to its efficiency in optimizing expensive-to-evaluate functions. For some practical problems, it is essential to consider the path-dependent switching cost between consecutive sampling locations given a total traveling budget. For example, when using a drone to locate cracks in a building wall or search for lost survivors in the wild, the search path needs to be efficiently planned given the limited battery power of the drone. Tackling such problems requires a careful cost-benefit analysis of candidate locations and balancing exploration and exploitation. In this work, we formulate such a problem as a constrained Markov Decision Process (MDP) and solve it by proposing a new distance-adjusted multi-step lookahead acquisition function, the distUCB, and using rollout approximation. We also provide a theoretical regret analysis of the distUCB-based Bayesian optimization algorithm. In addition, the empirical performance of the proposed algorithm is tested based on both synthetic and real data experiments, and it shows that our cost-aware non-myopic algorithm performs better than other popular alternatives.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85170376317&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2023/446; https://www.ijcai.org/proceedings/2023/446; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7257; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8256&context=lkcsb_research; https://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2023/446
International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know