Communication in the Gig Economy: Buying and Selling in Online Freelance Marketplaces
Journal of Marketing, ISSN: 1547-7185, Vol: 86, Issue: 4, Page: 141-161
2022
- 36Citations
- 6Usage
- 163Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations36
- Citation Indexes36
- CrossRef36
- 33
- Usage6
- Downloads4
- Abstract Views2
- Captures163
- Readers163
- 163
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent News
Improving buyer-freelancer communications in the gig economy
Researchers from University of Melbourne, Vrije Universiteit, Babson College, and University of Surrey published a new paper in the Journal of Marketing that provides generalized communication principles, and examples of how to apply them, for successful bid writing in the gig economy.
Article Description
The proliferating gig economy relies on online freelance marketplaces, which support relatively anonymous interactions through text-based messages. Informational asymmetries thus arise that can lead to exchange uncertainties between buyers and freelancers. Conventional marketing thought recommends reducing such uncertainty. However, uncertainty reduction and uncertainty management theories indicate that buyers and freelancers might benefit more from balancing—rather than reducing—uncertainty, such as by strategically adhering to or deviating from common communication principles. With dyadic analyses of calls for bids and bids from a leading online freelance marketplace, this study reveals that buyers attract more bids from freelancers when they provide moderate degrees of task information and concreteness, avoid sharing personal information, and limit the affective intensity of their communication. Freelancers’ bid success and price premiums increase when they mimic the degree of task information and affective intensity exhibited by buyers. However, mimicking a lack of personal information and concreteness reduces freelancers’ success, so freelancers should always be more concrete and offer more personal information than buyers. These contingent perspectives offer insights into buyer–seller communication in two-sided online marketplaces. They clarify that despite, or sometimes due to, communication uncertainty, both sides can achieve success in the online gig economy.
Bibliographic Details
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7542; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7576
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85117146222&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00222429211030841; https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00222429211030841; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7542; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8541&context=lkcsb_research; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7576; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8575&context=lkcsb_research; https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00222429211030841
SAGE Publications
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know