Algorithm Envelopment in Platform Markets
Academy of Management Review, ISSN: 0363-7425
2024
- 6Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage6
- Abstract Views6
Article Description
The theory of platform envelopment rests on network effects as the key mechanism for value creation, which nonetheless receives mixed support for its efficacy in determining competitive outcomes. We argue that the value of network effects depends on matching quality, which is a function of platform-specific algorithm technology and market-level data-driven learning. In formalizing these conceptualizations, we analyze a model that demonstrates how an entrant with a superior algorithm technology may outcompete an incumbent possessing a user base advantage, a strategy we call “algorithm envelopment.” By considering specific characteristics of data-driven learning, our analysis leads to propositions regarding the entry barriers for the enveloper, illuminating how learning may overshadow or interact with network effects in impacting the enveloper’s market selection decisions. We also show that market selection may be contingent on whether algorithm envelopment is instituted through competition or mergers, suggesting an interdependence between “where to enter” and “how to enter.” Finally, we explore the welfare effects of algorithm envelopment. We extend the recent debate on “data network effects” and show how teasing apart network effects, data-driven learning, and algorithm technology in envelopment attacks can generate novel implications for incumbency advantages, yield insights into platform diversification, and inform antitrust policymaking.
Bibliographic Details
Academy of Management
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know