Tests of a Partial Adjustment Model of Financial Ratios
Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Vol: 32, Issue: 3, Page: 96-111
1992
- 29Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage29
- Abstract Views29
Article Description
This article considers the formation of expectations in the financial ratio adjustment. An empirical model consistent with the rational-expectations hypothesis is formulated to analyze the dynamic adjustment pattern of financial ratios. The nonlinear regression method is used to estimate the parameters of the rational-expectations model and to test the validity of rationality. The empirical results show that the rational-expectations model explains the dynamic adjustment of financial ratios reasonably well. The results also show that the rational-expectations model provides a more efficient framework than the simple partial adjustment model for predicting the future ratios.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know