Risk Judgments and online privacy.
Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Convention
2007
- 33Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage33
- Abstract Views33
Conference Paper Description
This study examined how individuals’ judgments on risks related to online privacy (online privacy risks) were influenced by communication processes, prior experience, and self-efficacy beliefs. The results based on telephone survey data (n=914) of a national probability sample supported our predictions that 1) individuals distinguished two separate dimensions of risk judgments (social vs. personal level) when they evaluated online privacy risks, and 2) mass and interpersonal communication, prior experience, and self-efficacy factors were distinctively associated with the two separate levels of risk judgments. More specifically, 1) mass media effect was “impersonal,” affecting people’s perceptions of the prevalence of certain risks within a given “society,” but not necessarily altering their beliefs about personal-level risks, 2) interpersonal communication and prior experience had personal-level impacts affecting perceptions of risk to oneself, and 3) self-efficacy strongly influenced societal-level risk judgments. The findings suggest that an understanding of social contexts and psychological processes is very important to better comprehend the nature of public perception concerning online privacy.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know