A Framework to Learn Bayesian Network from Changing, Multiple-Source Biomedical Data
2005 AAAI Spring Symposium on Challenges to Decision Support in a Changing World, Page: 66-72
2005
- 34Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage34
- Downloads32
- Abstract Views2
Conference Paper Description
Structure learning in Bayesian network is a big issue. Many efforts have tried to solve this problem and quite a few algorithms have been proposed. However, when we attempt to apply the existing methods to microarray data, there are three main challenges: 1) there are many variables in the data set, 2) the sample size is small, and 3) microarray data are changing from experiment to experiment and new data are available quickly. To address these three problems, we assume that the major functions of a kind of cells do not change too much in different experiments, and propose a framework to learn Bayesian network from data with variable grouping. This framework has several advantages: I) it reduces the number of variables and narrows down the search space when learning Bayesian network structure; 2) it relieves the requirement for the number of samples; and 3) the learned group Bayesian network is a higher-level abstraction of biological functions in a cell, which is comparable from one experiment to another, and does not need to change much at the level when the learned group Bayesian network is applied to changing experiments - only the relationship between a group variable and an original variable should be adjusted. We have done experiments on synthetic examples and real data to test the proposed framework. The preliminary results from synthetic examples show that the framework works with fewer samples, and the learned group Bayesian networks from different sets of experimental data agree with each other most of the time. The experiments with the real data also show some domain-meaningful results. This framework can also be applied to other domains with similar assumptions. Copyright © 2002, American Association for Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know