Adaptive Duty Cycling in Sensor Networks with Energy Harvesting Using Continuous-Time Markov Chain and Fluid Models
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, ISSN: 0733-8716, Vol: 33, Issue: 12, Page: 2687-2700
2015
- 36Citations
- 272Usage
- 57Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations36
- Citation Indexes35
- 35
- CrossRef30
- Policy Citations1
- 1
- Usage272
- Downloads212
- Abstract Views60
- Captures57
- Readers57
- 57
Article Description
The dynamic and unpredictable nature of energy harvesting sources available for wireless sensor networks, and the time variation in network statistics like packet transmission rates and link qualities, necessitate the use of adaptive duty cycling techniques. Such adaptive control allows sensor nodes to achieve long-run energy neutrality, where energy supply and demand are balanced in a dynamic environment such that the nodes function continuously. In this paper, we develop a new framework enabling an adaptive duty cycling scheme for sensor networks that takes into account the node battery level, ambient energy that can be harvested, and application-level QoS requirements. We model the system as a Markov decision process (MDP) that modifies its state transition policy using reinforcement learning. The MDP uses continuous time Markov chains (CTMCs) to model the network state of a node to obtain key QoS metrics like latency, loss probability, and power consumption, as well as to model the node battery level taking into account physically feasible rates of change. We show that with an appropriate choice of the reward function for the MDP, as well as a suitable learning rate, exploitation probability, and discount factor, the need to maintain minimum QoS levels for optimal network performance can be balanced with the need to promote the maintenance of a finite battery level to ensure node operability. Extensive simulation results show the benefit of our algorithm for different reward functions and parameters.
Bibliographic Details
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/3166; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/3980; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/3808
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84960421930&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/jsac.2015.2478717; http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7264968/; http://xplorestaging.ieee.org/ielx7/49/7330054/07264968.pdf?arnumber=7264968; https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7264968/; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/3166; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4167&context=sis_research; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/3980; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4982&context=sis_research; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/3808; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4810&context=sis_research
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know