Modeling contemporaneous basket sequences with twin networks for next-item recommendation
IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, ISSN: 1045-0823, Vol: 2018-July, Page: 3414-3420
2018
- 23Citations
- 580Usage
- 39Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations23
- Citation Indexes23
- 23
- Usage580
- Downloads391
- Abstract Views189
- Captures39
- Readers39
- 39
Conference Paper Description
Our interactions with an application frequently leave a heterogeneous and contemporaneous trail of actions and adoptions (e.g., clicks, bookmarks, purchases). Given a sequence of a particular type (e.g., purchases)- referred to as the target sequence, we seek to predict the next item expected to appear beyond this sequence. This task is known as next-item recommendation. We hypothesize two means for improvement. First, within each time step, a user may interact with multiple items (a basket), with potential latent associations among them. Second, predicting the next item in the target sequence may be helped by also learning from another supporting sequence (e.g., clicks). We develop three twin network structures modeling the generation of both target and support basket sequences. One based on “Siamese networks” facilitates full sharing of parameters between the two sequence types. The other two based on “fraternal networks” facilitate partial sharing of parameters. Experiments on real-world datasets show significant improvements upon baselines relying on one sequence type.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85055715361&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2018/474; https://www.ijcai.org/proceedings/2018/474; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/4069; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5072&context=sis_research; https://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2018/474
International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know